Dear Guest,
Please register or login. Content don't create itself!
Thank you
-
Re: Best Online News Sources? Paid or Unpaid?
Originally Posted by
vertical_doug
You aren't reading the NY Post anymore? What about PAGE SIX! :)
Might switch.
-
Re: Best Online News Sources? Paid or Unpaid?
Originally Posted by
vertical_doug
You aren't reading the NY Post anymore? What about PAGE SIX! :)
I’d say page six of this thread (i do 20 posts/page) beats Page Six of the NY Post.
-
Re: Best Online News Sources? Paid or Unpaid?
Originally Posted by
bigbill
Joe Biden was to be a "place holder" while the Democrats developed a candidate for 2024. In 2020, Biden was ramrodded to be the candidate even though there were viable, younger democratic candidates participating in the democratic primaries. Harris dropped before the first primary because she was polling poorly. People viewed the "uncle Joe" persona as someone who would be competent in office and could beat Trump. The people who decided on Biden wrecked their party. The rise of Trump wrecked the republicans. This is the last hurrah for Trump, he either wins and can't run again, or he loses and is too old in 2028. .
Well, interesting take. I have a slightly different view but not by much. What wrecked the democratic party was the arrogance at the top of the DNC for at least the past 10 years. They don't really want a competitive race it seems. If you go back to 2016 with the Super-delegates for Hillary. The DNC top decided they wanted a coronation not primaries. Bernie showed up and almost toppled the self-appointed coronation. Hillary went on to run a terrible campaign for President, and with the demoralized supporters of Bernie, the rest was inevitable history.
2020, maybe Joe was ramrodded but it was COVID, and the country was maybe ready for 4 years of less action. The real betrayal was people with access to Biden, hiding his condition in 2024, and really poo-pooing any candidates. Dean Philips threw his hat in the ring, because he thought someone had to. The DNC did everything to sabotage the candidacy.
You can redistrict the US to create as many competitive districts as possible, but an election being competitive isn't mandated by the constitution.So changing gerrymandering by the vested interests is probably impossible,
The irony here was Trump was headed to a landslide in the spring. If he had waited to debate Joe in September, this would have been such an epic disaster for the democrats. Instead Trump jumped the gun and actually had a tighter race on his hands. The question for 2028, have the democrats learned anything and will actually let the primaries be competitive.
Republicans have separate issues, but you can't blame this all on Trump. He is merely the accelerant. The table was being set since at least the time of Newt Gingrich, and then by the people who decided to fund the local elections who understood control over districts would yield such dividends and what a great bargain it was from the amount of cash required. .
Similar Threads
-
By Too Tall in forum Cooks - Epicureans - Toque-istas
Replies: 13
Last Post: 10-13-2020, 08:58 AM
-
By zetroc in forum Cooks - Epicureans - Toque-istas
Replies: 16
Last Post: 08-02-2013, 11:07 AM
-
By Too Tall in forum Cooks - Epicureans - Toque-istas
Replies: 11
Last Post: 12-21-2011, 02:50 PM
-
By steve garro in forum The Frame Forum@VSalon
Replies: 3
Last Post: 01-03-2009, 03:59 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks