Dear all,
It is for me a pleasure to read a thread with so many insightful contributions.
I find it hard to believe that nobody has asked a single question on frame geometry.
Dario, Richard and Dazza are among the illustrious framebuilders that read this thread and
I find a privilege to be able to type some questions here, hoping that they might answer.
Please, find Eddy Merckx's custom Colnago frame built in 1970 for the Tour of France:
http://spinwell.files.wordpress.com/...pg?w=450&h=325
and a very similar Century geometry in the following table:
South Africa Merckx list +updates photo from the Road bike photo Gallery
To make things easy on readers, I just quote measurements for a sized 60 frame:
Seat tube 60cm, top tube 58.3cm, setback 18.5cm, seat angle 72degrees, fork rake 4.3cm and bottom bracket drop 7.5cm.
1. I would like to know which is your opinion about the kind of ride a racing steel frame with those measurements would provide,
bearing in mind that those frames were designed to race long stages on 70's quality roads.
2. 42 years have passed since inception of that frame. Steel tubing has improved and presumably the understanding
of the trade-offs involved in altering those parameters and effects on bike handling, riding and weight distribution of
someone measuring 1.85cm and weighting 95kg.
3. Given today's technology and knowledge, what would you change of those parameters if the goal is to achieve a bike which is a pleasure to ride,
with the necessary compliance yet efficiency, at 30km/h average and spend 4 hours on the saddle?
With respect, admiration and eagerly awaiting your opinions,
SteelRules.
Bookmarks