I admire your passion, but just about nothing you wrote makes sense to me. Your economic goals (as best I can makes sense of them) are mutually contradictory.
"frames should always be as inexpensive as possible." OK, so they should reflect the cost of materials and - what - slave labor? Or maybe materials and a living wage? Or maybe materials and a wage commensurate with, say, 30 years of experience? How much do you think a framemaker is entitled to earn? (Who makes this decision - you or the marketplace?)
"I want to beat and compete with those who make their stuff in taiwan." How does this desire jibe with this one: "my vision of american manufacturing might"? You want to beat Taiwan? There's no way you're going to do that and pay your American craftsmen a living wage, let alone a wage that compensates them for their expertise. You're going to have to go one way or the other - cheap bikes made by cheap labor or expensive bikes made by expensive labor.
"I've never paid retail for a bike in my life", so you've got no appreciation for the retail industry. This segment is facing massive pressures now (read the jerk's peices for a cogent discussion of what's going on), but if you ignore the value of a brick-and-mortar shop to create, support and perpetuate the cycling market, you're going to end up either peddling bespoke bikes to a very exclusive demographic or mass-produced off-shore generica to hipster webcrawlers.
Now as far as your aesthetics: "ruthless black ano killing machines", "no-frills all performance racing and riding machines" aesthetic. OK, I get that. And you'll save some production costs by not painting your frames, and even more by building them with 105 or LX rather than DuraAce or XTR. But you're never going to compete with Giant on cost, no matter how compelling your manifesto.
Your company's got a cool image and what looks like some really nice frames. All this righteous anger is just noise, atmo. But then I outgrew my infatuation with the noble outlaw about the time the Clash broke up. I'm guessing you're not going after my demographic, huh?
Bookmarks