Re: Virus thread, the political one.
Originally Posted by
72gmc
Well, easier. The general outcomes people want--security, employment, health--are still common across parties, it seems. The lesson of 2016 is the allure of the outlier for a large segment of voters. We're still looking for someone to unite us behind a plan for this virus, and maybe a lifelong establishment person is disqualified from the start with those people. Maybe the VP pick helps with that.
Maybe. I'm starting to think that the underlying meanings of those outcomes aren't really the same across parties and that's why we're seeing such division. So everyone wants security, employment and health, but those concepts are so broad that the populace will never align on anything other than platitudes. Again, maybe you're right that the VP pick gets people excited about Biden. I just wonder who would have gotten all the people excited...I honestly can't think of anyone. The range from Democratic Socialist to disillusioned non-MAGA Republican with everyone in the "middle" is a massive divide and I just can't think of the candidate that would be an easy choice for Republicans looking for change that doesn't turn off a huge part of the Democratic party. Maybe that's what makes Biden the right choice...nobody seems to actually like him. Like a medicine. Nobody wants to take it, but you know you have to because that's how you kill the disease.
Also, so there's no confusion, I'm not trying to argue with you, Dan. I don't disagree with you as much as I'm trying to process where we are in American politics. Biden's got my vote, but he's not at all who I wanted to be voting for...so I wish I had an "easier" choice as well.
"I guess you're some weird relic of an obsolete age." - davids
Bookmarks