As I'm sure you know, the Nimrod - a variant of the Comet, retired in 2011 (!!!)
An absolutely gorgeous aircraft, IMO:
Anthony-Noble.jpg
As I'm sure you know, the Nimrod - a variant of the Comet, retired in 2011 (!!!)
An absolutely gorgeous aircraft, IMO:
Anthony-Noble.jpg
What's odd is the regulation of US air flight over the past 20 years has netted a safety record unprecedented in the history of mass human transportation. It's mind boggling; one single fatality in the past 10 years, in which over 3 billion passengers were flown. Huh, I guess we've just been lucky this whole time.
Gorgeous is not a word I would use to describe the Nimrod.....
If one is looking for a more aesthetically appealing British jetliner turned military vehicle, look to the VC-10. It too is now retired. I took this photo on December 7, 2004 at Washington Dulles. This was twelve years to the day from my interview with my current (and hopefully final) employer.
This aircraft, like the Comet, 707, DC-8, 747, A340, A380 and more, has the correct number of engines.
La Cheeserie!
Can you imagine the wing spar design for that thing??? What a crazy-ass design. You would have to realize outrageous performance gains to make doing that worth the trouble; cearly that wasn't the case, even back then before high bypass fans, or everyone else would have adopted the design. And engine service or replacement; what a nightmare.
For the record, this is the de Havilland Comet, from which the Nimrod was derived.
La Cheeserie!
When's Boeing's senior management and board taking that ceremonial flight together on the MAX relaunch?
The VC-10, to me, always looks like those Ilyushin designs.... but I think the Ilyushins were (ahem) "designed" to look like the the VC-10 and not vice-versa. Front end, check.... but, four engines mounted in side-by-side configuration near the empennage looks, a little, well.... iron-curtain-y.
.... so, while we're talking aesthetically-pleasing airframes, can we just go ahead and crown the all-time winner?
Elvis would agree (although I think he had an 880, not a 990).
swissar-coronado-1200x640.jpg
The VC-10 was first. And looks better.
Factoid: when I lived in Switzerland and worked at Zurich airport occasionally the DPRK state Ilyushin IL-62 would visit unannounced. Given Switzerland’s low key, but often pivotal, position in international diplomacy most folks figured it was a diplomatic trip. But it was in all likelihood Kim Jong Un’s school bus from Pyongyang.
La Cheeserie!
Saab2k, I will respectfully disagree. This is not a press problem, this is a process problem. It's not that the coverage is unprecedented, it's that the executive suite is acting in a way that is not what we should expect from people who came from the background of designing, making, or flying airplanes.
I think the problem is that the bean counters took over the cockpit, and sent the engineers back to economy class. And didn't even buy them their first drink. Or even a second bag of peanuts.
Who gives a hoot about the code, what about the decision to produce an airframe that has a large unstable area in its flight envelope? This, to me, seems to be the unprecedented area in which this airplane is treading. But even that pales in comparison to the cover-your-ass way, instead of figuring out how to make the best damn airplane possible, that Boeing has acted.
Last edited by thollandpe; 07-09-2019 at 09:57 PM.
PS American management is toxic. GM killed Saab!
Cheers, TH.
You can see part of the spar design here, also note the Powder Room & Bullion Office.
Saab, where is the bullion office on the Max ?
e6a184b14a4b33136e093ff0c27ae1fb.jpg
The Bullion Office on the MAX8 is located ahead of the center fuel tank and is accessible to pilots only via a tunnel located in the flight deck and passing just behind the E&E Bay through the forward baggage compartment. Here is actual footage of a captain in the Bullion Office recently being asked to take concessions in the latest round of contract negotiations.
La Cheeserie!
Concorde.
Bookmarks