shrink, terrorist, poet, president of concerned cyclists for the abolishment of bovine source bicycle parts and head of the disaffected commie dishwashers union.
To the OP, I have a bike on order from some guy in Minneapolis that no one in my family has ever heard of. Now, I hear, he's thinking of moving his shop to another state. I am starting to worry.
For those who are jangling on about economics and supply and demand . . . be very careful. The whole of the 1980s was spent re-writing what the profession thought it new about markets, particularly when there is either incomplete or imperfect information (largely in response to the question: sure it works in practice, but does it work in theory?). If all you had was up to Econ 301, tread lightly.
Doesn’t every interest have some people searching for the esoteric while others pursue big box? Is that about the big box making a crap product or about something else, about some people liking non-mainstream items. Watches, bikes, cars, dbags … as the market grows so grows the number of people interested in the esoteric. New handmade builders are just filling a void in society. I don’t think it’s a reaction to the big box bikes at all. It’s a numbers game.
Some people want a Rolex others an IWC. Some buy a corvette and others a lotus elise. Some buy a krups and others a technivorm coffee machine. Some like the big box others not, but notice anything here? The prices are about the same in each category. In general, its not about the bike, the watch, or the car.
I really like my Specialized mountain bike. A lot. Maybe I could have duplicated its performance on a Santa Cruz for $1500 more. Or on a boutique custom builder's frame for an even bigger premium. But I wasn't interested. I don't have the same emotional investment in mountain bikes that I've got in road bikes.
I've got no interest whatsoever in Specialized road bikes. But that's me. I know some really super folks who like theirs plenty.
I'm really glad that Specialized exists and is able to deliver a high-quality, high-value product.
Dunkin Donuts, on the other hand, sucks.
GO!
Six pages of this and the not a mention of the frn anywhere... Thank God!
I think what Sacha was concerned about was the perception that the bike for sale was representative of his work. He makes it pretty clear that that particular frame was not in any way representative of a modern Vanilla. I would be concerned if I were him too and I applaud his honesty in publicizing that.
Business is war?
CaptStash....
PS: I really like the looks of that Skeletor frame.
just a question born out my inability to read through all the angst atmo -
so, you wanna do to them what they are doing to us?
but these are bicycles, for god's sakes. folks are buying and riding bicycles
atmo. if big corpo is as good at their task as you say, folks are riding bicycles.
we (framebuilders) can't fill that demographic void.
the vanilla part of this thread makes me think of the first few women i *ahem* became a man with... and how i really wish i could go back through time and apologize to them before hand for the lack of skill with the torch for all the good intentions.
i mean, i was good with the torch but i wasn't the maestro that i am now. oh just never mind. bad metaphor.
the fucking past.. at least mine doesn't show up on ebay or frame forum. all i have to live down are old drivers license photos and the fact that i wore a vest with no shirt and ripped jeans in the late 80's.
i like that the guys that are making bikes now aren't all the same guy. you know what i mean?
shrink, terrorist, poet, president of concerned cyclists for the abolishment of bovine source bicycle parts and head of the disaffected commie dishwashers union.
no one is doing the same dance they did then.
that part should never have needed to be articulated.
if we stayed 'there', we'd have never left.
and were that the case, there'd be no one to answer these questions atmo.
that cat should sell the frame for as much as he can get and the buyer can
live with the joy of knowing he has something rare and truly part of the left
side of the timeline.
While we don't really know what Sacha was concerned about, I agree with Stevep.
It might be frustrating if an old frame goes for as much as a new frame, especially if a builder knows he knows more now than he did when he built the old frame which is representative of his early work...but it seems to me that younger builders can learn a lot from Richard Sach's approach to his older frames that come up for sale. The man has style and grace when talking about his early work.
Last edited by M_A_Martin; 07-30-2008 at 02:44 PM. Reason: Richard posts three times as fast as I do...
i suspect your mom would plotz. parents hang on to the paperweights ... i've gone so far as to knock high school artifacts off desks in hopes of them finding the circular file ... no dice she still keeps the crap. if you want to continue getting culinary advice, i recommend leaving the relics alone.
Bookmarks